Court Docs. Exhibits, and Witnesses

10 Aug

Found these on amber heard russia on Twitter https://postimg.org/gallery/3412wejvq/ is amber’s evidence and https://postimg.org/gallery/1sm4ubuzg/ is johnny’s evidence

 

All I have to say is I’m glad jambernews posted some of these things – like the IG video of Amber Heard during her birthday weekend.

 

(Thank you Lauren)

Advertisements

87 Responses to “Court Docs. Exhibits, and Witnesses”

  1. maya August 10, 2016 at 8:54 pm #

    I think wasser should also look into her past criminal records from Texas and that sealed 4 year record. They might find that very useful indeed. Also the overhaulin episode where she was hitting Johnny.

    • aquagirl10009 August 11, 2016 at 3:36 am #

      I’d love to hear the deets about her Juvie record brought into the case. Also, overhaulin’. Daddy–he just wants to do right by his baby girl, which makes me think that she always shared this sick/punching sense of humor with him, even though she’s a woman. BTW: don’t forget that he taught her to shoot.

      So welcome to Austin–home of great live music, unique restaurants and so on. I’ve been there at least 10 times, have always loved it, and never saw anyone with a gun. Pick/up trucks, yeah, guns no. Austin is almost like a little island in the center of TX. That’s what makes it desirable. So why they would be shooting there, idk.

      But on overhaulin’, she definitely tried to smack Johnny, I watched it several times and he definitely stepped back to avoid her hurting or pushing him.
      Can’t even imagine such a reaction after all the $ he spent to fix her car.

  2. K August 10, 2016 at 9:52 pm #

    His altered tattoos are part of her exhibit?

    Great point Maya! Also the lack of respect she showed to the police flipping them off and yelling.

    • Sharis (@Sharriska) August 11, 2016 at 2:54 am #

      I was just about to post regarding this! As a proof of what? Him coming to his senses and moving on?

    • aquagirl10009 August 11, 2016 at 3:46 am #

      Yea but umm, they’re pen, not tattoos, except for him blanking out her body on his arm & changing slim to scum. So this makes him look bad how?
      It’s like changing dirty (‘& I mean dirty) underwear and starting a day anew.

    • Olivia August 11, 2016 at 5:41 am #

      It is only proof that she still are looking for his photos on Internet.

      • Jo32 August 11, 2016 at 7:12 am #

        She can’t handle the fact he moved on so quickly! Good point Olivia.

      • LilyS August 11, 2016 at 7:25 pm #

        Proof that she’s stalking him online. He needs a restraining order against her-and quick smart!!

        • Andy August 11, 2016 at 8:15 pm #

          She’s like the jackal in 13 ghosts

          • LilyS August 11, 2016 at 8:42 pm #

            oh god yes!!

    • emalp81 August 11, 2016 at 6:01 am #

      First post! From looking at the exhibit list that was posted on the website i think the use of the photos is to try to show some form of harassment; that by changing his tattoo from ‘slim’ to ‘scum’ JD is causing her emotional harm or distress and that this is what is being referred to as ‘subsequent conduct that may have been knowingly and willfully in violation of the existing May 27, 2016 Temporary Restraining Order’. If it is, it’s clutching at straws to say the very least.

      • overundersidewaysdown August 11, 2016 at 11:59 am #

        I think you are right. Her expert witness Nancy K-B focuses on Torts involving assault and battery and intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress. The expert witness could testify that his re inking his hand caused her emotional distress and embarrassment. If she has a tape recording using either of those words that could be a tie in to her testimony. Just a guess on my part. I am really curious about all security taping. Kind of has a Gone Girl feel….

        • emalp81 August 11, 2016 at 1:38 pm #

          Completely agree. Any material breach of the order they would have rushed to court. We have to remember the ‘Johnny breaches order’ hullabaloo when, in fact, the TRO had a provision allowing him to remove belongings. It has to be something emotional based. I did not see any DV expert on the JD expert list. I would think that one may be added.

      • Neeners August 11, 2016 at 6:48 pm #

        Yeah. I tend to agree with you. Embedded within RO’s is how abusers are not supposed to harass their victims etc. I’d say Amber will be trying to spin it that JD is harassing her via tattoo and causing emotional distress. *SMH*

        • PennyForYourThought August 11, 2016 at 7:23 pm #

          LMFAO!

    • swansta August 11, 2016 at 7:55 am #

      K, I think she wants to use his “SCUM” writing as a proof of verbal abuse.

      • Andy August 11, 2016 at 8:01 am #

        Good luck ah

      • LilyS August 11, 2016 at 8:40 pm #

        haha-wait!! Isn’t that like an admission on her part that she believes she IS scum? He never said it was referring to her it may well be the new name of his son’s band for all we (and she) knows…LOL

  3. LilyS August 11, 2016 at 2:30 am #

    Hmmm I hope her holding those pills aren’t going to be a way of her blaming him for giving her an std of some sort…and what an idiot “he changed his tattoos of me, and wrote bad words over them in marker!!” Those words may not even be about you honey…LOL Can’t claim they were written for her…and they are his knuckles, he can write whatsoever he pleases on them.

    • Brenda M Clemons August 11, 2016 at 11:27 am #

      I would think would be protected under his right to free speech.

  4. Jo32 August 11, 2016 at 3:58 am #

    171 pages of textmessages between Pennington and Marz.. wow.
    I can only imagine Scumbers expression when Vanessa enters the courtroom… :-O

  5. Ps August 11, 2016 at 6:41 am #

    I saw the name of Kevin Murphy in reports of Wasser, Kevin’s hair, and a photo of May 21 hmmm

  6. Liv-O August 11, 2016 at 7:17 am #

    Kevin Murphy- quick look, he is a special effects/makeup, mold technician…

  7. Maria84 August 11, 2016 at 7:50 am #

    There’s a sentence in her documents that caught my attention, that part that says that Respondent (Johnny) will be cross examined about subsequent communications or conduct ,some of which may have been knowingly and /or willfully in violation of the existing Temporary restraining order.
    I hope that he didn’t want to contact her after that, in any way…

    • swansta August 11, 2016 at 7:52 am #

      Maria84, I think that’s about that day when his “employees” came to pick his things (which RO allows) and she called the police.

    • emalp81 August 11, 2016 at 10:08 am #

      I found that interesting also. I could be wrong but would she not need to show that, since the TRO, there has been some type of ongoing action that would necessitate the need for a PRO? I wouldn’t be surprised if her Counsel make a claim that the photographing of the word SCUM was emotional abuse, that he put Doug Stanhope up to writing the article. Heck, if someone looked at her sideways in the coffee queue she would probably say the JD told them to do it. I think she needs to show that there is a perceived ongoing ‘threat’ that she needs ‘protecting’ from. I think if there had been any breach of the TRO, she would have been straight back before the Courts to have him held in contempt.

      • Sandy August 11, 2016 at 2:29 pm #

        He could also say that he was making a joke about himself since she has tried to make him out to be scum in the media. He does have a wicked sense of humor. But I will agree before anyone says it. …probably not the best time.

        • emalp81 August 11, 2016 at 3:41 pm #

          I would think the burdon of proof will be on her. As you say he could merely say it had nothing to do with her. Her Counsel will need to prove, to a degree, that the change was some direct threat to her. I would feel that unprovable. Shoddy work trying to link it. Clutching at straws.

  8. swansta August 11, 2016 at 7:50 am #

    Why the fuck would someone with no bad intentions even record (audio and video) debates and actions between her and her boyfriend/husband (for years). Just to get one word or one action that could be misunderstood? I mean…that’s just sick no matter how you look at it.

  9. Maria84 August 11, 2016 at 8:06 am #

    Swansta i thought that it could be about that day when he asked for his things to be removed out of the house. And i hope is just that. Yes about the record audio it shows that she was planning everything for a lot of time….she is sick

    • swansta August 11, 2016 at 8:12 am #

      Maria84, I think Toilet, Raquelle and her boyfriend helped her a lot. This started years before.

  10. swansta August 11, 2016 at 8:10 am #

    I don’t get a few of these evidence – does anyone have a suggestion? Amber’s evidence no 24 (what articles are that?). Also, look at Johnny’s evidence no. 511 – what do you think? Injury that she caused maybe? And what’s it with Raquelle and Elizabeth M. texts? Those two have obviouslly a lot to say to each other about Heard and Depp. And then there’s Johnny’s no 517 -they were texting? Not good. Wonder who sent the first text. Johnny’s no 529 – what video is that?

    Too bad Elizabeth Cline isn’t among Johnny’s witnesses.

    • stoney August 11, 2016 at 8:45 am #

      Ambers #24 Could be iOs story about “Why she called 911” or Stanhope’s blackmail claim.

      Johnny’s 511 They had dinner together at Ago that night and I think it’s supposed to be the night Johnny “attacked” her before she had to go on James Corden show.

      The texting between them is good I think. As the dates are April 21- May 26. Day before her birthday to before she filed for the restraining order on the 27th.

      Johnny’s 529 one of her friends posted an Instagram video on her birthday of them going to coachella. Johnny supposedly attacked her the day before this.

      —–
      Anyone know what Declaration of custodian of records is? I tried googling it but I’m too dumb understand.

      • swansta August 11, 2016 at 8:59 am #

        Stoney, thanks. No 511 – so you think those pictures show him attacking her or him drunk?

        • Olivia August 11, 2016 at 9:02 am #

          It’s Johnny’s evidence, so probably not

          • swansta August 11, 2016 at 10:05 am #

            Olivia, oh God, that reply confused me. Yes, it’s his evidence, that’s why I thought maybe she hurt him and he has a picture of the injury. Thanks.

      • Pennywise August 11, 2016 at 9:25 am #

        “A custodian of records is an institution or individual that can act as an agent and exercise legal authority over the financial assets of another individual or company”. In my non-legal mind thats like a special accountant for Johnny’s records.

        • stoney August 11, 2016 at 2:36 pm #

          Thank you!

  11. Pennywise August 11, 2016 at 9:57 am #

    Hell Andy’s Jambernews has collected more shit on Amber than anyone. All Wasser’s people need to do is go through this site and follow up on all the evidence presented here. Her pulling him away from his fans, her speaking disparagingly to her mother, her hitting Johnny on Overhaulin…I mean the list continues!!! 🤔

  12. overundersidewaysdown August 11, 2016 at 10:27 am #

    JD 528 connecting TMZ to the costume fitting story. She did not go to London did she. I wonder if that report will establish a pattern of untruthfulness. Wasn’t that the story where she had lost so much weight that they told her not to come because she could not be fitted? They may have someone on the inside who will say that was not true. Didn’t that get her out of her first depo? Hmmm. I wonder if that is the plan to chip away at each story and establish a chain of lies.

    • Olivia August 11, 2016 at 10:40 am #

      The story about losing weight was usual BS from her camp. For Wasser the most important thing was the excuse for not doing the depo – costume fitting in London.

  13. Chelle August 11, 2016 at 10:37 am #

    I just gotta say something about her “medical” evidence because, as we all know, we were led to believe by her “sources” (aka lawyers) that she had some kind of medical record to submit as evidence. (I believe they even called it “proof.”) Unless I’m mistaken or I missed something, the only item of evidence relating to this is a medical intake form (please correct me if I’m wrong). I laughed my ass off at this. Some evidence. *eye roll*

    I work in a doctor’s office. In case anyone was wondering, a medical intake form is a highly generalized and basic medical form that any idiot can download from Google. Typically, medical intake forms ask very (VERY) basic questions… name, date of birth, reason for office visit, current medications, maybe insurance info, and other straightforward questions about a patient’s overall health, such as any allergies, recent medications, etc. They’re vastly insignificant in comparison to a physician’s actual chart note, so much so that our office hardly (if ever) uses them anymore, and when we do, they get shredded when done. They’re so simple that a monkey could complete one without difficulty, and I’m willing to bet that there is more than one monkey on this planet with more comprehensive skills than Amber Heard.

    Furthermore, I cannot emphasize enough how easy it is for any lawyer (or patient, even) to request copies of medical records. I process legal requests for records on a daily basis. If there was something in her medical record that showed proof of abuse, it would be AH’s golden ticket, and they would certainly go with actual records instead of a measly intake form. It is weak to provide an intake form over a verifiable medical record, and quite, quite laughable. So why use an intake form as evidence? Because there is no verifiable medical record, because, as is common knowledge, any medical professional who values their license to practice medicine is legally obligated to report ANY and ALL signs of abuse to the proper authorities, and if that had happened, we would have known about this a helluvalot sooner.

    Sorry for the long post, but there’s my two cents on the issue. I’m sure some clinics have more involved intake forms for their patients to fill out. But at the end of the day they all serve the same purpose. So go ahead and spend some time browsing Google for examples of intake forms and have a good laugh to think that any lawyer would try to submit one as evidence. Samantha Spectre is better off saying that Johnny sneezed in Amber’s general direction and gave her cooties.

    • my4doodles@gmail.com August 11, 2016 at 11:37 am #

      Interesting! Thanks for explaining that, Chelle!

    • LZ August 11, 2016 at 3:48 pm #

      Unless they downloaded the intake form from some medical website, Scumnt and/or a member of her squad could have just stolen it from a hospital or a clinic hours before telling the press about her list of documentary evidences.

      • Chelle August 11, 2016 at 5:24 pm #

        Precisely. They’re easy to come by. Before we stopped using them, we had them on the front counter. The thing with intake forms is that, more often than not, they’re filled out by the patient and not the doctor/nurse/medical assistant, and if they are filled out by a MP, it’s very likely that they’re asking the patient the questions and the patient is providing the answers. They’re based on personal changes/questions, not typically a medical exam. That’s why they’re not as good as a visit note that is 100% written by a medical professional.

        • LZ August 11, 2016 at 6:08 pm #

          True. It’s really ridiculous that Scumnt and her very smart lawyers think that an incomplete intake form can prove that she sought medical help after experiencing “abuse”. If she’s asked why she wasn’t able to finish it, I won’t be surprised if she says “I changed my mind about consulting a doctor because I don’t want to harm Johnny.” Yeah, right!

          • Chelle August 11, 2016 at 6:51 pm #

            Or blame it on PTSD. Some bullshit about how she wasn’t composed enough to write. Too traumatized. She’s so transparent, it’s painful to watch.

  14. PennyForYourThought August 11, 2016 at 10:46 am #

    Here’s a question for anyone who can shed some light. Does anyone think that Vanessa being called has just as much to do with her time with Johnny and their relationship, but also too how the kids interacted with AH? I mean if the kids witnessed something or they themselves had an issue with AH, wouldn’t they tell their Mom as well as their Dad? I’m thinking Lily Rose has to have some sort of knowledge as she’s older and may have witnessed fights or something. She was on the plane when AH accused JD of abuse. That particular event has bothered me, I think there’s something there. There’s also flight crew and staff who may have witnessed something or overheard something. Just a thought, looking forward to the comments on this.

    • Olivia August 11, 2016 at 11:04 am #

      There wasn’t any fights on the plane, it was never mentioned in any court document, it was some rumors from English tabloids.

      • PennyForYourThought August 11, 2016 at 11:46 am #

        No it’s in the original filings. She stated JD assaulted her on the plane and also was smoking marijuana too. I believe they were on their way to Japan, if I’m not mistaken. Someone here will correct me if I’m wrong, but she’s referenced a few different times of abuse, along with the April and May incidents.

    • swansta August 11, 2016 at 11:31 am #

      PennyForYourThought, I was thinking about that incident too – that’s I would like to see Elizabeth Cline on the stand too. Maybe her lawyers will ask Toilet about that (she was there, right?). I agree with you about Vanessa, but I think that the main reason she’ll be there are the kids (their stories, their interactions with Heard, …). Not just about that flight, but other opportunities too.

      • PennyForYourThought August 11, 2016 at 11:50 am #

        Who’s Elizabeth Cline? Never heard of her before. And Toillet was on that flight too? If so I never heard about that before, interesting. Seems like these two have been in cahoots for a very long time to bring JD down. Premeditated, which is evil.

        • swansta August 11, 2016 at 12:25 pm #

          PennyForYourThought, yes, it was the flight to Japan. Amber said that he was drinking and doing drugs (in front of his children), screamed at her and kicked her. After that kick she hide herself and spend the rest of the flight in the toilet. Toillet said it was true.

          Elizabeth works in Disneyland, she’s also a writer and was professionaly involved with Johnny. She witnessed amber’s sick behaviour, that’s why I think she would make a good witness. She wrote this to Jonathan Shaw and he published it with her permission (Andy, I hope you don’t mind):
          I’ll probably get into trouble for this but guess what? I don’t care….
          When Johnny was promoting Lone Ranger at Disneyland I was with him the day he came to the park with the kids and amber this was right before this trip to Japan. Like the week before.
          I’ve worked a couple of premieres but im telling this…
          The whole day they were at the park amber was mean and nasty. She was rude to me and rude to everyone who was working around them. (I’m not going into her fit over a water bottle) She was grabby and snooty. she wanted to be in charge of the kids and johnny and everyone else. powertrip. Johnny was his normal self. Friendly and calm. Like I’ve seen him forever. The kids had fun and I will say both of them acted like they could care less about her and stayed away from her and distant as much as possible. You could feel the discontent of lily especially. I didn’t see any interaction between them at all. in la during his night show appearence she hubg onto him every second we could see him. noone that has worked around him as far as i know has ever liked her. she usually brought her own friend bc none of his friends interacted with her almost at all.So im stating this as bull… Johnny has been drinking and he had wine during the junket like always but no hard drugs were evident at all the two days I saw him.

          There’s also another article from her titled When It’s Time To Stay Silent. Google it (her name, last name and title of the article), Shaw has it on his FB page (June 8th). Interesting reading.

          • Gil graham August 11, 2016 at 12:40 pm #

            Wow haven´t read the “When it´s time to stay silent.” – article before. Very well written!!!

          • Olivia August 11, 2016 at 12:50 pm #

            One thing – IO wasn’t with them during the trip to Japan.

          • Andy August 11, 2016 at 5:24 pm #

            Thats only because her sex partner at the time was Brittany Eustis

          • emalp81 August 11, 2016 at 1:19 pm #

            Thanks very much for this info; heading off to read this now. I’m late to the background so playing catch up.

          • Andy August 11, 2016 at 5:26 pm #

            Shes a great person, personally asked me if she could post her article here, and I said “Of course”

        • Andy August 11, 2016 at 5:29 pm #

          She’s on of Shaw’s friends, and worked with JD before. Super nice. She wrote to me and asked if I would publish her article. Great write up.

    • emalp81 August 11, 2016 at 11:40 am #

      I don’t think that Vanessa would be able to give evidence on what the children told her, it would be hearsay.

      • Olivia August 11, 2016 at 11:46 am #

        It isn’t necessary, there are a few witnesses who are going to talk about their relationship.

        • emalp81 August 11, 2016 at 1:29 pm #

          My understanding is that a witness can discuss what they spoke to AH or JD about as they are in Court to substantiate or refute. It will be hearsay to give evidence as to a conversation with someone who isn’t in Court as that cannot be substantiated. There are a few exceptions to the hearsay rule I’m not from the US so not sure what they are in the California jurisdiction.

      • PennyForYourThought August 11, 2016 at 12:01 pm #

        Yes would make sense but isn’t that the whole basis for Scumbucket’s case? All of her friends/witnesses only heard the alleged abuse and or the aftermath, none of them ever seen JD abuse her in person. But we don’t know if the kids witnessed any abuse, from either side. Incidents could have occurred when neither JD or AH were aware the kids were present, within earshot or visual. They are minors so they may not be able to attend court and testify but IF they told their Mother of said incidents, she could testify to what they told her. Who knows, just a thought I’m putting out there. Because AH said an incident happened on the plane, there could be others too that the kids witnessed.

        I think anything and everything comes into play here, because Scumbucket was around the kids and had interactions with them. Because they’re minors and the court won’t allow them to testify, their Mother could on their behalf and relay what the kids told her. Also too, the court will ask Vanessa how her relationship was with JD, had she met AH and if so what the interactions were. If there were any issues and if so what and with who. I know I’d want to meet the woman who’d be spending time with my kids, that’s for sure.

        • Olivia August 11, 2016 at 12:18 pm #

          Amber said so many things, how many of them turned up to be true ? Not many, and there are his bodyguards and his assistant who could tell about it. Johnny doesn’t want to entangle his kids into this case.

      • Gil graham August 11, 2016 at 12:08 pm #

        I think Vanessa will just testify about the relationship she had with Johnny to falsify that there have been any abuse patterns in the past.
        I think Johnny wouldn´t want to even mention his children names in the court room to protect them.

        • PennyForYourThought August 11, 2016 at 12:22 pm #

          That makes sense but Scumbucket already said in court documents that an alleged incident of abuse happened on a plane with his kids on board. She has already involved them, bitch! And anyone who has followed Johnny knows that he’ll do anything to protect his kids and family.

          I’m not from the US either but where I live if you state drugs were done in front of kids and violence was perpertrated as well that would be an automatic flag and call to CPS and would trigger an investigation. To my knowledge one hasn’t been done regarding this issue/accusation.

          • Gil graham August 11, 2016 at 12:30 pm #

            I think the plane incident wasn´t mentioned in court documents. According to several gossip sites it was an “insider” who talked about it just to the tabloids.

          • Andy August 11, 2016 at 5:27 pm #

            IF you hit someone in from of a child, its automatic child abuse (charge) in the Usa

    • aquagirl10009 August 11, 2016 at 3:57 pm #

      I definitely think it’s Vanessa’s experience plus some of the things the kids told her.

      • LZ August 11, 2016 at 4:39 pm #

        Me too. Plus, Scumnt could’ve gone hysterical or threw a tantrum while she’s around, purportedly out of “jealousy” because she (Scumnt) “loved Johnny very much” (sarcasm).

      • Neeners August 11, 2016 at 6:53 pm #

        This! I keep wondering why Vanessa has been called. Sure, she can state JD was never violent to her in their relationship, but VP has strong feelings about Amber Heard. And why? VP has always been pretty classy. I’m pretty sure she ended the relationship or it was mutual. I suspect it has something to do with how AH treated the kids. The pics of Lily-Rose with Amber and Johnny are sad. The young woman always looked pained – as if she didn’t want to be there. I truly believe VP cares a great deal for JD still, even if it’s not romantic, but I sense she’s about to go Mama Bear here.

  15. Gil graham August 11, 2016 at 12:03 pm #

    I wonder how Laura Wasser got all the text messages between Raquel and IO or between Amber and others. Were Amber obliged to hand them over?

    I´m a bit scared that there is a settlement on the weekend because Johnny doesn´t want to put his people through this (especially Bruce Witkin and Vanessa) and Amber probably gets really cold feet right now.

    Futhermore I wonder why she is avoiding depo so much. Because in the declaration for the restraining order she declared under “penalty of perjury” that all she said about the alleged abuse is true. Couldn´t she already be held liable for this when Johnny and his team proof that she is lying? Is there another kind of penalty when you lie in a deposition? (I´m not American so I´m not familiar with the justice system there).

    I hope they will sue her for defamation and slander but I fear that Johnny just wants this all to be over.

    • Chelle August 11, 2016 at 12:56 pm #

      I believe Amber was obligated to hand over the phone records to Laura Wasser. There was something in the legal records that Wasser filed when she said Amber refused to do her depo that said she also failed to provide documents that had been requested… unless I missed it, I don’t think those documents were specified, but could very well have been the phone records. Either way, I think any good lawyer is able to subpoena phone records if Amber refuses to turn them over willingly.

      I think at this point, if there is a settlement, it will be proposed by Amber and her lawyers. I think given all the evidence we’ve seen, Laura Wasser has this in the bag. If I were Amber (and thank God I’m not), I’d be terrified of all the witnesses and evidence Wasser has put forward in legal documents.

      In America, you have to take an oath swearing to tell the truth when you do a deposition. It may vary from state to state (I’m not sure myself), but it is a very big deal if you are caught lying under oath. Same goes for filing a false police report, which is a felony, and why many of us here believe she never chose to file said police report.

      I’m sure Johnny wants this to be over quickly, too. But we don’t know what he’s made of. He may surprise us all!

    • Liam August 11, 2016 at 1:06 pm #

      I remember she requested text messages (forget the dates) before the hearing was initially postponed. I wondered about it too though since she just said Amber had refused to hand over requested documents. Didn’t say specifically what that I know of. I hope there’s not a settlement since I really want him to be able to clear his name. There are still people who still don’t, at the very least, question Amber’s integrity in all of this. There’s so many exhibits about Raquel’s and Elizabeth Marz texting. Elizabeth Marz is a makeup artist, in case no one knew. “LizMarz” is her website and same woman with the same name as one of Raquel’s FB friends. She’s also from Austin TX. It’s convenient that so much evidence from Johnny’s side consists of the neighbor and a makeup artist that has known Amber since her school days. I can’t comment on charges she may or may not face or what Johnny can sue her for after all is said and done but I want his name cleared.As we all do

      • Olivia August 11, 2016 at 1:22 pm #

        The settlement could be on his conditions which will be presented to the public plus apologize video 😉

        • Chelle August 11, 2016 at 1:58 pm #

          LMAO! Except this time she won’t be able to “persuade” Johnny into sitting next to her.

          • Olivia August 11, 2016 at 2:08 pm #

            This time could be her squad 😉

        • Andy August 11, 2016 at 5:21 pm #

          Oh FUCK no! “California is a beautiful continent, with a treasure TROUGH of oats and pellets that I love. It’s been wonderful keeping my Chiclets white and sharp, but all of this should not be messed with. Johnny Depp should be left alone to wander in his homeland. I have tainted this place, NYC,LONDON, AUSTIN. Basically I’m a plague wherever I go. —-SLAAAP— : random fan walks by and slaps her out of her seat :

          • Chelle August 11, 2016 at 5:26 pm #

            LMFAO. Oh dear Lord, Andy. The visual is too much. Hahahaha!

          • LZ August 11, 2016 at 5:56 pm #

            Hahahahaha. Nice!

          • Pennywise August 11, 2016 at 7:41 pm #

            Oh snap!!! I can hear that SLAP!! Smmmaaakk!! KABAM bitch! On the floor your ass goes!

  16. LZ August 11, 2016 at 3:32 pm #

    The lawyers have already talked about settlement issues several times, but no resolution has been reached. Perhaps it’s because part of JD’s demands is for Scumnt to withdraw the DV case. It’s obvious that she’s doesn’t want it dropped until he complies with her divorce terms, which he refuses to do – for good and valid reasons. Thus, he wants everyone involved in the case – both from her and his sides – to sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA). Obviously, she doesn’t want to sign the NDA because she still wants to make money using him and their 15-month marriage even after their divorce. Perhaps she already has sold the rights to “her story” to some book publisher or film producer or both.

    As for using his knuckle tattoos as evidence in her favor, Scumnt and her team are probably treating it as a form of harassment (as if they are not harassing him in the media). It seems that they have been monitoring him, and Scumnt thought that he’s still interested in her. Nonetheless, it will help us assess the situation better if we have a copy of the TRO issued by the court to JD. Using this document as a guide – http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/dv110.pdf – it is not known to us if Judge Moor checked all of the items under Personal Conduct Orders (#6). If he imposed a “No contact” rule, JD can’t reply to Scumnt regardless of how many times she texted or called him. I’m sure Wasser explained to him what he needs to do based on the TRO.

    • Andy August 11, 2016 at 5:11 pm #

      She thinks if the divorce goes to court a judge will give her more.

      • LZ August 11, 2016 at 5:54 pm #

        I hope the new judge will be fair and just.

        Somebody mentioned in a previous post that the change of judge wasn’t just about scheduling, but more on Moor being quite lenient towards Scumnt, and that Wasser’s father is pretty influential.

        If you remember, Andy, I emailed you a woman’s set of comments on TMZ, stating that she knew that the judge (Moor) will favor Scumnt. She also belittled Wasser’s credentials. With Scumnt’s behavior last Aug. 6, Moor could’ve penalized her, but there’s no such order. So I can’t help but think that that that woman was telling the truth about the judge being quite partial towards Scumnt even if he rejected her request for spousal support.

    • Gil graham August 11, 2016 at 6:13 pm #

      You can see the restraining order against Johnny here: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2848234/Amber-Heard-s-restraining-order-against-Johnny.pdf

      I can imagine that her lawyers will claim that he “indirectly contacted” her with the scum tattoo. Hope the judge doesn´t agree to that. That would be so ridiculous.
      But maybe one reason Johnny covered the tattoo after the story was in the headlines was because Wasser advised him to do so.

  17. prancenmoon August 11, 2016 at 3:51 pm #

    Lol she’s lying

  18. Jo32 August 11, 2016 at 6:08 pm #

    The court documents are great and it’s good to know what’s going on. Buy you know..some new pics would be great though.. are all the journalists/photographers asleep or on holiday?

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: