The Crow

13 Aug

UPDATE

 

tattoos

The quality of the video is so bad you cant see the tat in the above screenshot. HOWEVER it can be seen in others. Perhaps it’s bad quality video but this tattoo seems to have moved further up on his hand. AH well…it can be blamed on bad quality.

 

tat1tat2

Advertisements

28 Responses to “The Crow”

  1. TheOriginalGuest August 13, 2016 at 8:44 pm #

    I noticed that right away. He got the crow tattoo in September 2012. So she was either setting him up from the get go (wouldn’t be surprised) or it is a Johnny impersonator. Since he has the hat and the glasses on it is difficult to tell.

    • Andy August 13, 2016 at 8:58 pm #

      Negative he;s too heavy for 2012 – its there

  2. Who it is? August 13, 2016 at 8:51 pm #

    That’s a great point, Andy! At no time can you actually see his mouth moving to the audio.

    Also, I took a screenshot of that man, when he’s trying to get the phone, and it does not look like Johnny Depp at all. His hands are pasty white, and shaped differently it looks like, as well.

    • miss.betty August 13, 2016 at 9:03 pm #

      No, when the “I’ll show you crazy…” bit is going down it is impossible to tell if his mouth is even moving.

      • Who it is? August 13, 2016 at 9:04 pm #

        Yeah, you’re right

  3. Tgirl August 13, 2016 at 8:52 pm #

    Good find Andy.

    She must have been taping him from the beginning. Proof she planned this all along. Gathering evidence to use to bring him down.

    The video was edited so she could have taken the audio from one and spliced it to this one. Omg what a piece of work this psycho is.

    • Andy August 13, 2016 at 8:58 pm #

      He’s too heavy for it to have been before 2012. The tattoo is there, it’s just….further up….

      • Tgirl August 13, 2016 at 9:02 pm #

        Yeah see it now. Video is so crappy it’s hard to tell.

  4. aquagirl10009 August 13, 2016 at 8:53 pm #

    Weird that he has the hat & glasses on, but no rings.

  5. miss.betty August 13, 2016 at 9:01 pm #

    Hey, Andy…

    I’ve downloaded the vid, attempted to enhance it to no avail, but have run through the thing frame by frame a kerjillion times. I’m not sure if the time code will be the same playing from TMZ or YouTube, but at 1:22 you can see *something* on the hand that may have been an attempt at replicating the elusive crow tat a la sharpie or whatever. The problem is that it is too far up on the hand & mostly hidden by the cuff. The tail of the crow on the JD tat extends almost to his knuckle.

    I think that the impact of this video is due to the power of suggestion. It is very easy to lay an audio track over a vid; I do it all the time for my work. A 5th grader could do it in iMovie… no big deal. So we are left with an authentic audio track as we watch a person looking like JD (if you have glaucoma) – your mind fills in the blanks. Likewise, I am not convinced that he is drunk in this exchange, rather it is inferred by the suggested/imposed (via editing) narrative.

    I am not typically prone to conspiracy theories, but there are so many dubious aspects to this vid. I ask whether I simply do not want for it to be authentic, but in actuality it does not bother me at all if it is JD. I am not bothered by someone pissed off throwing tantrums in their own home. At least it wasn’t done in a legal office when he was supposed to be giving a deposition.

    • Andy August 13, 2016 at 9:08 pm #

      Exactly miss.betty. I agree

    • Strider August 13, 2016 at 11:07 pm #

      Exactly!! if it´s him, it completely understandable if he gets pissed because he´s being secretly filmed by her own wife in his own house for Christ sake!! the psycho one in this video is only her.

  6. miss.betty August 13, 2016 at 9:06 pm #

    As for the vid quality, I suspect that the heavy pixellation is due to it having been compressed intentionally to achieve the obfuscation. There is no device produced in the past 5 years or so that takes such crappy vid. You have to really work at it to make it as jacked up as it is.

    • Andy August 13, 2016 at 9:09 pm #

      True. Compression at standard quality.

  7. Ervic August 13, 2016 at 9:16 pm #

    The real question here is, why the horrible quality?

    • stoney August 13, 2016 at 9:20 pm #

      That’s what gets to me. Her evidence photos and video look like they were taken with a potato but her naked pics..clear as day. Some are kind of artsy even WTF

      • Ervic August 13, 2016 at 9:32 pm #

        And then we can add the hat, the sunglasses, the lack of his tattoos, the lack of his cheekbones, the thickness from under his chin, the weight, and the fact that even when he grabbed the phone at the end, he clearly made no attempt to delete the video. All of that has to mean something.

        • miss.betty August 13, 2016 at 9:54 pm #

          I think the bit about the vid not having been deleted is telling. If this is a guy who has been violent and abusive toward his wife, there is little doubt that when the discovery that the recording was being made, its deletion would soon follow.

          • LZ August 14, 2016 at 2:14 am #

            Yes. Totally agree. “JD” could’ve just deleted it instead of throwing the phone.

            What made me initially doubt the authenticity of “JD” being the real one in the vid is the jaw line. The guy didn’t have that prominent facial structure, and his chin looked a bit chubby. When he spoke, he sounded like JD, so I thought I was wrong.

            Then I read Ervic’s comment and it made me replay the vid many times. I noticed the guy’s weight, and he’s quite bulky in the middle. I screen grabbed some bits and something’s lacking with his “costume”. Since he’s got very dark shades and a cowboy hat, how come he was sporting just one or two necklaces that are almost unnoticeable, and had no rings. I could barely see the tats on his right hand. Then I checked again the frames that show his face and chin, and his jaw line was conspicuously different.

            Also, the vid’s story line has no coherence, akin to an impromptu sketch, hence, we hear confusing statements from Scumnt herself (“What happened?”, “I just woke up”, and “All I did was say ‘sorry’ this morning”). And JD stating, “Did something happen to you this morning? I don’t think so.” I didn’t hear her reply to his question, yet he said “I don’t think so.” She was even wearing a sling bag, as if she (and a companion) just fetched the guy playing JD and they gave him his “script” on the way to the “apartment”. Seems like this “incident” is a role-play. Scumnt playing herself while “interacting” with (a fake) Johnny Depp.

            Does “heavily-edited” mean that JD’s not denying that he was the one in the video or that the man was an impersonator?

          • Ervic August 14, 2016 at 4:16 am #

            I think I’m more inclined towards the theory miss.betty said above now. The one saying that the audio track is authentic, but the video is of an impersonator, and then the audio is laid over the video. She could secretly record him in a bad moment (because the more I listen to it, the more it sounds just like him to me), then hire someone to act out according to the audio? Is that what “heavily edited” mean, that the voice we hear is in fact him? Is that why there’s no denial from his team?

          • LZ August 14, 2016 at 8:50 am #

            I’m not sure if JD’s team will further clarify things about the video because there could be more that will be leaked if there’s no settlement yet. Nonetheless, I agree that miss.betty’s theory is highly possible.

          • Maria84 August 14, 2016 at 10:38 am #

            I totally agree with you! If someone did that to me i would leave that person purple! and i don’t consider myself violent lol ! what she was caught doing would be her end in the hands of a violent , and super famous , person.

      • Noni August 13, 2016 at 9:48 pm #

        A potato hahaha lovely!

    • Strider August 13, 2016 at 11:09 pm #

      Good point, she´s lying oce again.

  8. johana August 13, 2016 at 9:40 pm #

    The face of “Johnny” are different in screencaps. I was thinking, maybe she got made montage?? Maybe, first she get Johnny in video until when he put the glass on the table and after it is another guy??? Amen to Lynn to it: “JD didn’t look or sound too drunk to me. He sounded pissed, as if he caught her red-handed at something”.

    • Cat August 13, 2016 at 10:14 pm #

      One thing that I do know is that unless you really know a person, it can be hard to tell if they are drunk or how drunk they are, unless of course, they are falling over and slurring words.

      It’s amazing how functional an alcoholic can be and be totally wasted that they cannot remember the next day.

      With that said, I have no idea if he’s drunk or how drunk, but it doesn’t matter. That video should never have “leaked” and given the poor quality, it appears that it has been around the block, or doctored or both.

      Given that Johnny’s team didn’t deny that the video was him, I think it’s “real”, but there is no context. Yep, heavily edited.

  9. LINDA August 13, 2016 at 10:29 pm #

    Its Waldo in that video… I just know it

    • johana August 13, 2016 at 11:53 pm #

      Who is Waldo?

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: